Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Ooligan in topic Ooligan

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Arnur.sarybai

[edit]

Zix001 (talk) 04:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Files deleted. Given that they just received their final warning, I prefer not to block for now. If they disregard the warning and continue to upload copyright violations, we will take action. Jianhui67 TC 05:11, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. I closed a lot of DR-s against his files (all as deleted) and nominated one more file for regular deletion as likely copyvio, but in my opinion block is currently not needed. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Terrell52

[edit]

Terrell52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Unresponsive to talk page warnings, continues uploading copyvios/fair use. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:19, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done: Uploading of files disabled for 1 month, all remaining uploads deleted. --Achim55 (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Main Page

[edit]

This page's protection level should be reduced to allow autoconfirmed and confirmed users to edit the main page's talk page. Dwccb10 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Protection request

[edit]

Please protect Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2026 as page is used in central notice. Protection until 15 March. Admins edits only. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 01:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done. Also indef-blocked a bunch of temporary accounts for vandalism and honestly can't be bothered to leave explanations on their respective talk pages, I'm about to have dinner. - Jmabel ! talk 02:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel thank you. It was hard fighting them. Thanks for coming in and saving. :) ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 02:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Protection Request

[edit]

Commons:Wiki_Loves_Folklore_2026_in_Portugal - Used in Central Notice Banner Nokib Sarkar (talk) 07:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. I semi-protected it for a month. The page has never met vandalism. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please block User:Gzen92Bot indefinetly (unapproved task)

[edit]

Gzen92Bot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi, please block User:Gzen92Bot. Due to unapproved task, especially per the following rationale:

  • User User:Gzen92 has been warned repeatedly (e.g. here [1]) and the bot has already been blocked multiple times for unapproved use and the user does know that a bot request is required prior to taking up a new task
  • The currently performed edits seem to be in scope of Commons:Bots/Requests/Gzen92Bot-3, which was actually not approved
  • Also, currently the bot is performing mass edits without edit summaries which in itself is troublesome
  • Also, whereas I do not want to discuss the specific task here, the bot performs mass category moves on user-generated new category-trees (e.g. here [2]), such edits should be discussed and not silently enfored under a bot flag

Thus requesting an indefinetly block of the bot. The user should file a bot request to discuss and address the above issues. --Schlurcher (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Schlurcher: Hi, I think you should inform the user. I did it for you this time. Yann (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello, the bot is being monitored, let me explain.
I categorize files when there are more than 100 files in a daily category, mostly manually (see my edits). If `cat-a-lot` can't be used ("location=France") or if I'm already doing a `cat-a-lot` with my account, to save time, then I use the bot (without editing summaries, indeed). No problem, I'll stop using the bot. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Gzen92 (talk) 07:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Gzen92, per my inerpretation the bot policy on commons is actually quite liberal when it comes to fully monitored (tool-assisted) edits. However, they should be performed with a bot flag only when you have a pre-discussion (approval) on this. The same policy would allow to use you bot script on your main account (which I think could be combined with your cat-a-lot changes). My only ask is to please use sensible edit summaries (which was the main part that could your edits on my watchlist) and please do not use a bot-flagged account for such non-approved edits. --Schlurcher (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your comments, I understand. Gzen92 (talk) 08:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done, no action needed. --Schlurcher (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ooligan

[edit]

Ooligan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

User is making a joke or fun by adding Category:Deceased Commons users to User:Bob Burkhardt and User:Library Guy then remove it in a few minutes. I don't think such kinds of action is funny and falsely claimed someone is dead is a serious issue and must not be tolerated. ~2026-73864-3 (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done per note on dewiki: de:Benutzer:Bob Burkhardt based on https://www.facebook.com/events/shirley-public-library/local-artist-bob-burkhardt-art-show/528175199121485/ --Achim55 (talk) 09:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@~2026-73864-3,
I have just added this to the Admin board here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Regarding confirmation and recognition of an allegedly deceased contributor.
You must have missed the history pages where I wrote "will check with administrators" in both of my edit summaries here and here after I reverted my own edits, because I thought it would better to ask for advice from an Admin. Thank you @Achim55 for confirmation. Please, comment at the link above, if you can. Thank you and best regards, -- Ooligan (talk) 09:51, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply